Atıf Formatları
Comparison of two different methods of detecting residual caries
  • IEEE
  • ACM
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • BibTeX

U. KOÇ VURAL Et Al. , "Comparison of two different methods of detecting residual caries," Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.1, pp.48-53, 2017

KOÇ VURAL, U. Et Al. 2017. Comparison of two different methods of detecting residual caries. Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.1 , 48-53.

KOÇ VURAL, U., KÜTÜK, Z. B., ERGİN, E., YALÇIN ÇAKIR, F., & ÇİFTCİ, S., (2017). Comparison of two different methods of detecting residual caries. Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.1, 48-53.

KOÇ VURAL, UZAY Et Al. "Comparison of two different methods of detecting residual caries," Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.1, 48-53, 2017

KOÇ VURAL, UZAY K. Et Al. "Comparison of two different methods of detecting residual caries." Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.1, pp.48-53, 2017

KOÇ VURAL, U. Et Al. (2017) . "Comparison of two different methods of detecting residual caries." Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.1, pp.48-53.

@article{article, author={UZAY KOÇ VURAL Et Al. }, title={Comparison of two different methods of detecting residual caries}, journal={Restorative Dentistry Endodontics}, year=2017, pages={48-53} }